About Me

I am 24 Years old, and I have voted only once. Based on the survey, I am a "Social Conservative,” which is a Republican group. Although I do not agree with all their ideals, I do relate to most of them. I am a bit religious, like Social Conservatives, and I also support environmental issues. Social Conservatives also have a strong anti-immigrant sentiment, as do I. I am NOT conservative on social issues like abortion and gay marriage; I believe that these choices are up to the individual. Social Conservatives are 91% white, 58% female, and average age is 50. I am none of those! 56% of them have a gun in their home, which I do have. I took this class because it was required for my degree that I am pursuing. I hope to get a better understanding of how the government of Texas operates, and how I can do my part to make Texas a better place of all Texans.

Friday, May 13, 2011

Critique of: New Texas Immigration Law Proposed


                The blog post, “New Texas Immigration Law Proposed,” by Angie Avila, is about House Bill 2012. House Bill 2012 proposes to make it illegal to hire illegal immigrants for any job except, what they call “housework.”  Avila believes this bill is unfair to American citizens because the unemployment rate is so high, and illegal immigrants are taking all the jobs. I disagree with this statement. In my opinion, unemployed American citizens do not want to work at the jobs the illegal immigrants are “taking.” Most of the immigrants work construction or in the custodial industry and get paid minimum wage or less if under the table. I believe that illegal immigrants are taking the jobs that Americans do not want to do. I am on unemployment, and I make more money form unemployment benefits, than I would working as a janitor!
                Avila also states that House Bill 2012 would “allow others to look down on Latinos and only think of them for minor labor work.”  I feel like immigrant Latinos are already looked down upon only for minor labor work. For the most part, illegal immigrants usually know very little, if not any, English and cannot work in jobs that require communication. If a Latino is an American citizen, like me, then they would not have to worry about getting a normal job, however there is still racism around the workplace that will probably never go away. Sometimes I feel like people are surprised when I do not have an accent or speak any Spanish. I do, however, agree that the HB2012 will make Latinos being looked down even worse. As Avila put it, “the employer knows that they need that job, and if the employee complains [about harassment], they can replace them with another illegal immigrant right away.
                Avila is concerned about Americanized illegal immigrants who have been in this country for years. She states, “There are also the illegal immigrants who have lived in America most of their life, who have studied here, grown up with the same values as Americans and this bill would completely limit them to do house work since it would be very risky and illegal for someone to hire them.” That I do agree on 100%. There are illegal immigrants who came over here many years ago, and do not have any family in Mexico or do not know anyone in Mexico. This bill would affect them very negatively!
                Immigration is a huge problem in Texas, and if the bill is going to make it illegal for the hiring of illegal immigrants it should make it illegal for all jobs. However, I would propose that the illegal immigrants, that are here now, be made American citizens. Of course there would be certain parameters set to make them eligible for citizenship. Something like, showing proof of residency in America for a certain amount of years, or showing that they have been paying their taxes (even though some have fake SSN’s). Although this is not the perfect plain, it is a lot better than HB2012.

Monday, May 2, 2011

Budget and Guns for College?


                The article “Texas Senate to Tackle Budget, Concealed Carry,” by Melissa Ayala, which I found on the thedailytexan.com, is about a budget bill, for the 2012-2013 biennial, and how the legislatures are “looking for methods of easing the $15 billion to $27 billion budget deficit for the 2012-13 biennium.” The article also covers a bill filed by Sen. Jeff Wentworth “that would allow concealed-handgun license holders to carry on campus.” These two bills will affect the lives of many Texans, particularly Texan students.
                The article state last month, the House passed the budget bill, “which included major cuts to education and health care,” and that “last week, the Senate Committee on Finance passed its version, which restores some of that funding.” I hope that the Senate is coming to their senses and realizing that education for Texans is very important. The Senate bill version will decrease the funding cut by about $12 million less than the House version of the bill. The bill is likely to pass, but the only debate is that it will reach into the Rainy Day Fund to fill the $12 million funding that is not going to be cut. I understand that they would like the money to stay in the Rainy Day Fund, for something that is really important, but what is that saying about Texas higher education?
                Now, switching over the Concealed Carry on campus issue the article covers. “Wentworth surprised senators when he proposed an amendment to allow concealed carry on campus during debate for the higher education bill.” The higher education bill would lower tuition fees, but apparently Sen. Judith Zaffirini, who introduced the bill, does not agree with Wentworth’s Concealed Carry amendment bill, and will kill her bill “if he is able to successfully pass his amendment.”  I would like to see the Concealed Carry on campus bill pass; there are only about 2% of Texans who have Concealed Carry licenses and I do not believe that it would make higher education institutions more dangerous. I would also like to see the Higher Education bill pass, because lower tuition fees would really help out the millions of college student in Texas.  I hope that they will consider what is best for the students, and not their personal views.

Monday, April 18, 2011

RE: Red Whit and Brown


The latest blog post “Red White and Brown,” by Mike Youngblood, is about the city of Austin officially being a white-minority city, applying to the population under 18. Youngblood believes that “hatemongering is sure to come” because of predictions that the youth population will be a minority-majority by 2020 and the nation as a whole by 2043. I agree with that statement. The growing minority population is certain to bring up many differences among the nations population.
I do not feel like this is a racial commentary and I agree with Youngblood, that this is a racial over-sensitive society. There are still many racial issues in America, but people are too quick to accuse others of being racist.  I am also glad that the minority population is growing, but I do not think that it will “equalize” us. As long as there is a majority and a minority, there will always be differences among them two. We can only hope that the majority, who was the minority, will stop the racism, but that is very unlikely. As Youngblood put it “I’d hate to be a white child in certain parts of Detroit.” Even if the racism stopped on the minority-majority end, that still will not change how the white racists feel. Some people’s minds are just stuck “in an ignorant time and place.”
This was a well put together blog post. I like the way that Youngblood associated racist behaviors as “ignorant beliefs,” and that those beliefs were from “an ignorant time and place.” Racism is ignorance! The lack of knowledge and culture of a society to another makes people to perceive the differences in them, not the similarities. We are all humans, and I think most of us want the same things in one way or another.

Monday, April 4, 2011

Next Years Budget - Bad for Students!


                House Bill 1 has passes the House with a 98-49 vote, and now it is turned over to the Texas Senate. The Bill is for the Texas State budget fiscal year of 2012-2013. The bill reduces the budget by is $23 billion from last year's budget. According to the bill, many cuts are being made to public education! It also “cuts state funding for colleges and universities by more than 10 percent”, which is bad news for students like you and I (Embry). I think that the Senate should vote against this bill and revise it, so that more money is allocated to public education. The state of Texas is one of the fastest growing states in population, and with more people come more students.  Texas schools rank close to last, if not last, in performance compared to the rest of the states. It does not seem logical to cut the budget for education, when it obviously needs more money! The Bill is not going to increase taxes to raise money that is needed for education and other social services. Governor Rick Perry says “you cannot tax or spend your way to prosperity, and Texans expect their elected leaders to govern under that truth when it comes to taxpayer dollars”. Part of that is true, but I think that raising taxes would be the only logical thing to do, to make up for money that is required to run the education system and social services. They should let themselves and tax payers hold the burden of their mistakes, not Texan students. Hopefully the Texas Senate will come to their senses and change the bill to allocate the appropriate amount of money toward public education.

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Money for Texas?


                In David Jennings’ blog called Big Jolly Politics, he wrote a post called “Texas Legislature should use part of Rainy Day Fund.” Jennings states that he has been blogging for a very long time, since he was a teenager, and does his research on his topics, which shows in is post. This gives Jennings very good credibility. His argument in this post is actually the title; he thinks that the Texas Legislature should use part of Rainy Day Fund (Economic Stabilization Fund) to help with the current Texas budget deficit of $4.3 billion. He says that “the House needs to pass HB 275 and be done with it.” HB 275 is a bill that will take $4,273,557,000 from the Rainy Day Fund and deposit it into the general revenue fund to make up for the $4.3 billion budget deficit. Jennings reasoning for this is that “there isn’t $4.3 BILLION to cut in the next five months.” He also states that “there are much bigger fish to fry and we need the current legislature to focus on that.” I’m guessing the education of about 4 million Texas students or the problems along our border. This post is directed toward the “Tea Party people,” who oppose taking money from the Rainy Day Fund. Jennings makes a good argument, and I agree with him. How are we supposed to come up with $4.3 billion in cuts when they aren’t there? I think that if Texas has the money, then it should use it to correct there mistake. I do not believe that cuts from government jobs and educations will help our economy in any way. We will just have more unemployed Texans and more uneducated children that will not be prepared for the future of Texas.